5 Common Building Design Errors Caught During Peer Review

After reviewing hundreds of building design packages across Melbourne

and Victoria, the team at Integral Design Solutions has seen the same

types of errors appear again and again. Here are the five most common

— and how we catch them before they cost you money.

Error 1: Drawing Coordination Failures

The most common error type: dimensions, levels, or elements that are

inconsistent between architectural, structural, and services drawings. A

window shown at 900mm wide on the architectural drawings but 1200mm wide

on the structural drawings. A beam shown at 400mm deep on the structural

drawings but with only 350mm clearance in the ceiling void on the

architectural drawings. These coordination failures are invisible when

you look at individual drawings but obvious when you compare them —

which is exactly what a peer reviewer does.

Error 2: NCC Non-Compliance

Building designs that do not meet NCC requirements are discovered either

during peer review, during building permit assessment, or during

construction inspections. The later they’re discovered, the more

expensive they are. Common NCC compliance failures include: inadequate

fire separation between building classes, non-compliant stair geometry,

insufficient natural light and ventilation to habitable rooms,

substandard energy efficiency performance, and accessibility failures in

Class 2 and commercial buildings.

Error 3: Specification Gaps and Ambiguities

Construction specifications define the materials, products, and

standards of work required. Vague or incomplete specifications give

contractors licence to use cheaper alternatives, which often leads to

disputes and quality issues. ‘Provide structural steel framing’ is an

inadequate specification. ‘Provide Grade 350 structural steel framing

to AS 3678, hot-dip galvanised to AS 4680, minimum 85 micron coating’

is an adequate specification.

Error 4: Missing Structural Engineering

Architectural drawings without corresponding structural engineering

drawings are incomplete — but are surprisingly common. Peer review

regularly identifies architectural packages that include structural

elements (cantilevered slabs, long-span roofs, retaining walls) for

which no engineering design has been produced. These items cannot be

constructed safely without engineering input and should be flagged well

before construction begins.

Error 5: Heritage Condition Non-Compliance

When planning permits are issued for heritage properties, they often

include detailed conditions about materials, colours, window types, and

the extent of work. It is surprisingly common for construction drawings

to be prepared without fully reflecting all permit conditions. A peer

reviewer who compares the planning permit conditions against the

construction drawings can identify these discrepancies before they

trigger a compliance order.

Ready to Get Started? Contact Integral Design Solutions today for

expert peer review and design compliance services services in

Melbourne and Victoria. Visit integraldesignsolutions.com.au/ or call

us to book a free consultation.

Info@integraldesignsolutions.com.au

208 White Road, North Wonthaggi VIC 3995, Australia

cropped-IDS.png

A profound design process eventually makes the patron, the architect, and every occasional process eventually makes the patron

copyright 2026 integraldesignsolutions